Instructions for Manuscript Reviewers
Thank you for agreeing to review a manuscript of CFeS.
Your feedback is crucial for maintaining the quality and integrity of the publication process. Please follow these guidelines to ensure your review is thorough and constructive.
CFeS employs an open peer review system, where reviewers disclose their identities to promote transparency, accountability, and constructive feedback.
Manuscripts undergo rigorous evaluation by experts in the field to ensure scientific accuracy, clarity, and relevance.
Objective of the review.
1/ Is the manuscript orginal?
2/ Is the research question clearly defined
and significant?
3/ Is the methodology appropriate and well-described?
4/ Are the results and conclusions well-supported by the data?
5/ Is the manuscript well-written, logically structured and free of major errors? ?
6/ Are the references relevant and sufficient?
7/ Does the manuscript adequately cite relevant literature?
Specific areas to address.
Title, Abstract and Key words.
Introduction.
Materials and Methods.
Results.
Discussion.
References.
Types of review.
Accept.
Minor revision
Major revision.
Reject.
Provide detailed, actionable feeback.
Suggestions to improve clarity.
Comments on organisation and logical flow.
Concerns with the analysis.
Ideas for further research.
Timeframe for review
Timely reviews (2 weeks) are crucial for maintaining the journal’s schedule.
Submission of the review.
Please submit it through contact
Thank you for your time and valuable contributions to the review process.
Your efforts ensure the integrity and quality of the research published in this journal.
Looking forward to your review, Sylvain Cuvelier and Anila Paparisto.
Chronicles Fluturat e Sqhipërisë.
https://zenodo.org/communities/cfes/
An open Access Journal, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
© 2025. Fluturat e Shqipërisë and the Editors. |
|
.
